TPA is a Test for Mark Green

by Sean Hackbarth

Let me add a few thoughts to Owen Robinson’s take on the TPA’s status.

First, Owen’s correct that GOP leadership failed to get a common-sense, uncomplicated amendment passed. We shouldn’t be surprised with State Senate Majority Leader Dale Schultz because he could care less about limiting government (and his own importance). With Speaker John Gard it’s a case of being too concerned about one’s political future. Gard cares more about winning a seat in Congress than limiting government spending and power. It would have been better for the TPA if Gard would have stepped down as speaker; but that would have hurt his chance at getting Rep. Mark Green’s seat. In Gard’s political calculation he put his future ahead of the state’s. That shouldn’t be surprising if you view politicians like I do as fairly rational, self-interested participants in the political economy.

Second, the TPA can be saved. Even with the short amount of time left gubernatorial candidate Mark Green is the closest the Wisconsin GOP has to a leader. Schultz doesn’t give a damn about conservatives, Gard is too busy running for Congress, and party leaders Rick Wiley and Rick Graber are too often the two that can’t shoot straight. Only Green is in a position to build a unified front to get a tax limitation amendment passed. It’s conceivable his campaign could write an amendment that either limits state and local government spending or taxation that isn’t a Rube Goldberg document policy wonks, lawyers, and judges will argue over for years. As the flag bearer for the Republicans he could get Gard and Schultz to at least get a vote on the amendment.

If the TPA dies this year like I think it will I won’t put the blame on Green. I’m sure he assumed a GOP-controlled legislature could get something passed. The political situation is such that Green could really enamor conservatives. He would solidify his limited government credentials and have something tangible to hold against Gov. Jim Doyle. If the TPA goes down Green can use the issue in the campaign. For Green it’s a no-lose proposition.

Owen is right in the title of his post. “Leadership Does Actually Matter.” Mark Green has an opportunity to show the state he has the ability to lead by getting his party’s act together.

Leadership Does Actually Matter”

Save and Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Furl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Fark

11 Responses to “TPA is a Test for Mark Green”

1

The only real way to “Get the Party’s Act Together” is to get the RNC to hold party members accountable to the Party.

We never see any Republicans in any state house/senate or federal house/senate get their Politcal Party association revoked for being too far dissimilar with the RNC party platform.

It is about time we hold people to the Party Platform…

Until this happens, I wouldn’t put much faith in any politician that thinks he can get anything done.

2

Yeah! God forbid any of our elected officials think for themselves!

3

Yeah! God Forbid that Politicians have to listen to their Constituents.

4

DJ,

Do you vote for Politicians so that they can do the exact opposite of what it was you voted them in for?

I am not asking for a REVOKE of a politician’s political party association at the drop of a hat.

I am talking about a politicians entire term of office.

If a politician wants to run for re-election he should be re-evaluated by the political party and if that politician has been behaving FAR DISSIMILAR to the Party Platform then that politician is denied the right to run for re-election under that party name.

This is pure common sense.

it is about asking for HONESTY in politics.

No one wants to vote for JOE SCHMO only to find out later that JOE SCHMO’s ideology is completely different than what he said it was prior to election day.

5

Liberal’s that know they can not obtain office running as a DEMOCRAT….. Tend to instead run as a Republican, fight to get the Unions on their side, and overtake / overrun the Primaries.

A Liberal then after seizing the Primary Elections through UNION VOTES, proceeds to get elected by Conservatives who tend to vote Republican just for the sake of not wanting to vote Democrat.

6

“No one wants to vote for JOE SCHMO only to find out later that JOE SCHMO’s ideology is completely different than what he said it was prior to election day.”

I know; that’s why so many conservatives nationwide are getting so pissed at the borrow-and-spend GOP, as well as their President, Mr. “Compassionate Conservatism, I’m a uniter not a divider” Bush.

I guess for your “hold the party line or be tossed from the party” plan to work, what better way than start with the guy at the top?

Anyway, i think political parties are a joke. So whatever.

7

DJ,

The guy at the top gave us a 4.7% unemployment economy, lower taxes over the course of 10 years, Good Supreme Court Justices….

And most importantly.. The guy at the top actually as a SPINE to fight Terrorism after we suffered through former president William, Paper Tiger, Clinton.

Much of the problem with the GOP resides in the Senate… President Bush is the executive branch and he has no authority to write/pass legislation.

He can only sign or veto whatever bills come to him.

Removing George Voinovich, Arlen Specter, or John McCain, or Sean Hackbarth (oops), would be better worth our time than to NIT PICK President Bush.

“Anyway, i think political parties are a joke. So whatever.”

I’ll take that as a POINT in my favor.

8

But he’s vetoed not a thing. pretty much makes him an accomplice to the runaway spending of the GOP, does it not?

Anyway, i’m sure you didn’t understand my point regarding seeing political parties as a “joke.” I think the entire concept of political parties (and career politicians, for that matter) is against the spirit of governance by the people, for the people that America was founded on. I wouldn’t be happy simply with political parties that behave in accordance to what they stand for; i’d be happy to see the whole concept of political parties done away with.

And while i’m pipe dreaming, i’d like a pony, a record deal, and 26 hookers.

9

DJ,

Political Parties are what gives voters a clear and present idea of what the candidate’s belief system is.

Without Political Parties, you would confuse the whole voting issue rather than help it.

Good bye goes the Party Platform, good bye goes much of the information on a candidate’s background and ideology and ect.

10

So, you’re saying that voters are too stupid and lazy to look at individual candidates individually?

Hey! We agree on something!

11

Your site is thought provoking. Great job.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>