Webb Slammed for Fictional Scenes

by Sean Hackbarth

Jim Webb wrote some racy scenes in his novels, and he’s getting grilled for it. Yeesh! Sen. Allen, is this your knockout blow? This stunt lowered your Presidential candidate standing even more in my eyes.

There are those who think Webb was stupid to run for Senate knowing his literary past. I’m not one of them. Books are lands of the imagination. Writers like Webb put together scenes and use words, some offensive, to tell a story. Is the new standard fiction writers can’t run for office?

There’s also literary criticism like this from Curt at Flopping Aces:

Listen, I know it’s only a piece of fiction but why would he write this kind of pedophilia which provides nothing to the story?

I mean if the book was about a pedophilia, maybe a fight against it, then ok….but it added NOTHING to the book. It was just added for no apparent reason.

The simplist answer is Webb was trying to do something with the scene but failed. Maybe he was trying to create a surreal, exotic vibe. Novelist, even the best, don’t accomplish their goals in their books.

Allahpundit makes two good points: 1) “Have we actually reached the point where Senate seats now turn on the sex scandals of fictional characters?”; and 2) “If George Allen had written this book, not only would the left be going berserk, they’d be circulating lists of characters in his other books whom they suspect of being gay.”

I’m glad I’m no where near Virginia. Give me a break.

“Stupidest. Campaign Issue. Ever.”

Lost Soldiers

Save and Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Furl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Fark

7 Responses to “Webb Slammed for Fictional Scenes”

1

I think probably you guys should be a little more concerned about the real pedophiles in the Republican party, not the imaginary ones in Webb’s head.

2

Just so someone says it, i’d like to remind the lovely readers that when Republicans get outed for writing lurid subject matter (i.e. Scooter Libby and the bearsex or whatever that was), it’s funny because they belong to a political party that has a history of trying to legislate morality. Hypocrisy by association? Unfair? Maybe. But it’s funny! And in the case of, say, Alan Keyes, who condemns homosexuals to hell even when he has a lesbian daughter, it’s fairly telling of him as a person.

Democrats don’t exactly have a reputation for trying to, you know, keep sodomy illegal or anything like that, so even though the material in Webb’s book may be racy, taboo, sick, whatever…it’s not as blatant a show of hypocrisy.

Anyway, the important point is that focusing on fiction is stupid.

3

Chet,

We are deeply concerned about the Pedophiles in the Democrat Party…

And certainly… I rolled my eyes when I heard this story.

It’s a fictional book! Who cares!

It has absolutely nothing to do with Senate business, except if James Webb plans to donate his book sales profits to saving Social Security.

4

DJ,

You are ridiculous.

Democrats have JUST AS MUCH hypocrisy as Republicans.

I am sick of the tired, old, old, old, beat up argument that Republicans = Moral and therefore anything Republicans do wrong is far worse than Democrats.

You guys are hell bent on distorting reality in order to make your Political Party look better than the Republicans, regardless.

Sick of it!

Why is it that Liberals carry 1 set of rules for Republicans and a completely different set of rules for themselves?

5

“Why is it that Liberals carry 1 set of rules for Republicans and a completely different set of rules for themselves? ”

As long as Republicans insist on telling us about their determination to hold themselves to a higher moral standard than the other guys, we’re going to keep judging them against that standard.

It’s the hypocrisy, stupid.

6

Chet the Brainless said,

“As long as Republicans insist on telling us about their determination to hold themselves to a higher moral standard than the other guys, we’re going to keep judging them against that standard.

It’s the hypocrisy, stupid. ”

First of all, Republicans do hold themselves to a higher moral standard than the Democrats.

When Democrats are pedophiles they get re-voted in and at worse suffer a censure with a round of applause.

Mark Foley was immediately removed out of the House!

There is no hypocrisy what-so-ever.

And that’s my point.

You MORONS give Republicans a completely different set of rules than yourselves.

I guess this is more proof that LIBERALS = EVIL IDEOLOGY.

7

Both Political Parties have to be held accountable to the same moral standard.

Otherwise instead of Republicans versus Democrats…

We end up with GOOD versus EVIL.

If that’s what you want CHET THE BRAINLESS MORON TWIT, then that’s fine with me. As long as you understand that you are making your political party look like absolute Dirt.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>