Dems Ditching Debate on Fox News

by Sean Hackbarth

The Democratic Presidential candidates debating on Fox News would have been a good idea. Previously I wrote, “Winning elections is about getting your message to as many receptive people as possible. Not all watch CNN or MSNBC, two more sympathetic networks for liberals.”

MoveOn.org, who thinks they “own” the Democratic Party, and other hard core Democrats can’t see the tactical advantage of going on Fox News. First, they’d be in front of millions of potential voters. It’s similar to the notion that any publicity is good publicity. Second, should Fox News not be “fair and balanced” it will have happened with every major media outlet watching.

I laughed at the way the Nevada Democratic Party weaseled its way out of the debate:

The Nevada State Democratic Party is pulling out of a controversial presidential debate scheduled for Aug. 14 in Reno and co-hosted by Fox News, according to a letter released late Friday from state party chairman Tom Collins and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev).

The letter said Nevada Democrats had entered into the agreement with Fox, despite strong opposition from Democratic activist groups such as MoveOn.org, as a way of finding “new ways to talk to new people.”

But Collins and Reid wrote that comments on Thursday by FOX News Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes, when he jokingly compared Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, the junior senator from Illinois, to Osama bin Laden, “went too far,” and prompted Nevada Democrats to end the partnership.

“We cannot, as good Democrats, put our party in a position to defend such comments,” the letter said. “In light of his comments, we have concluded that it is not possible to hold a presidential debate that will focus on our candidates and are therefore cancelling our August debate. We take no pleasure in this, but it is the only course of action.”

The debate is months away. With the fast news cycles no one would remember Ailes attempt at humor. The state party simply found a way to back out without looking completely like they caved–even though we all know they did.

“Nevada Dems Nix Fox Debate” [via Michelle Malkin]

Save and Share:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Diigo

4 Responses to “Dems Ditching Debate on Fox News”

1

Yeah I can see that “fair and balanced debate” right now…

“Senators Edwards and Clinton – which one of you hates the troops the least? You have 2 minutes each.”

2

Winning elections is about getting your message to as many receptive people as possible.

Receptive, of course, being the key word. Why should Democrats have a debate on Fox News? So they can immediately afterward be ripped to shreds by Brit Hume, Fred Barnes, Mort Kondracke, Bill Bennett, Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly?

Fox News has every right to be as biased as they want. The Democrats have every right to stay away. Democrats, in fact, should all avoid Fox News completely. Let them be the network for right-wingers, and right-wingers only. That’s what they want to be anyway, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

3

Second, should Fox News not be “fair and balanced” it will have happened with every major media outlet watching.

Perhaps, but the mainstream media is notoriously lazy. Any “journalistic” narrative created by FOX after the debate would simply be parrotted by most other media outlets after the broadcast–not necessarily because Fox is that powerful, but because other media outlets are simply too lazy to utilize their own perspective (with a few notable exceptions, like Keith Olbermann, your favorite guy ever). CNN debunking the Obama “madrassa” story was the exception rather than the rule.

Good for the Democrats that they eventually said “no” to this trainwreck. And while i’m not a fan, good for Edwards for taking the point on it.

With the fast news cycles no one would remember Ailes attempt at humor.

Exactly why the Dems needed to respond now. A major figure at a NEWS network shouldn’t be recorded in public making such bad jokes, and ones slanted against one particular side, for that matter. “Fair and Balanced” indeed.

4

No media bias here. Move On, uh, I men move along.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>