“Crusaders” Lead Mock Attack on NJ School; Christians Not Pleased
Julia Gorin directs me to a New Jersey story where a school and local police engaged in a mock terrorist attack. The fictional culprits were radical fundamentalists calling themselves the “New Crusaders.” Local Christians weren’t happy with the depiction. It would be easy to jump on officials and declare them anti-Christian, but a good scenario requires details. Only Hollywood can get away with placing South African racists, Nazis, or Serbians as the bad guys instead of Islamist terrorists. They couldn’t call the invaders Martians. The participants would have giggled about little green men throughout the exercise. If the township named the attackers the “New Crescent” and portrayed them as Muslim fundamentalists groups like CAIR would have gone ballistic. (I would have gone the eco-terrorist route. That kind of bad guy hasn’t been touched in movies.) Instead, the local police went with a group, Christians, who are less inclined to bitch and moan. It’s partly the fact that American Christians let it roll off their backs. It’s also partly the fact that Christians aren’t violent like Islamists.
“That Strange Hostage Drill in New Jersey”













It’s also partly the fact that Christians aren’t violent like Islamists.
How soon they forget. I guess you forgot that, prior to 9/11, the most destructive, fatal act of domestic US terrorism was committed by a Christian.
Apparently you’ve forgotten how many abortion clinics Christians have bombed, and how many such doctors they’ve murdered, cowardly, from hiding with sniper rifles.
Did you forget the “Last Temptation of Christ” riots? How many died at the hands of rioting Christians?
I wouldn’t say that Christians are as violent, currently; but to say that they’re not violent at all? You flatter yourself, I think.