Immigration Debate Rooted in Fairness

by Sean Hackbarth

The defeat of the immigration bill comes not from a debate over abstract notions of “open borders” or globalization. Most of the strong opposition to the immigration bill lay with the feeling illegal immigrants were getting away with breaking the law. It comes down to fairness. There’s a feeling that there’s one set of rules for them and another set for citizens. Many believe that if they entered another country illegally they’d be arrested and deported in short order. But in the U.S. a blind eye is given. Add to that illegal aliens getting jobs that could be held by natives. Whether that’s accurate or not that perception is there. Comprehensive immigration bill opponents want all people who come to the U.S. to play by the same rules.

So if you do play by the rules you’re welcomed with open arms even if the rules are messed up. This e-mail sent to Glenn Reynolds illustrates this:

I’m a professor in California and my wife holds a masters degree in accounting. We’ve already spent thousands getting work permits. We’re now in the process of applying for green cards … they’ve make it so complicated you can’t reasonably do it without legal help, and all up (legal fees plus government filing fees), it’s costing us over $9000 for my wife and I to apply for Green Cards. On July 30th, they’re increasing the filing fees. Currently it’s $940 for me and $740 for my wife. Come August, it’ll cost $2200 for the main applicant and $1725 for the spouse. On top of that, they wouldn’t let me pay tax as a married person until I’d been in the country for 10 months, so not only was there no “tax amnesty” for me, I was in fact paying more taxes than an American in the same position. I find Americans are always shocked when I tell them how much it is costing us. It seems like every few months they make it more difficult for people who want to do it legally.

Here are people playing by the (Byzantine) rules. This situation garners sympathy. I think many who opposed the comprehensive immigration bill would want something done to ease the burden of these people.

Take this sense of unfairness and combine it with Washington politicians who still don’t understand they live in a highly-networked, instant communications world. A combustible situation resulted. The ripple effects (yes, I’m mixing metaphors) will be far-reaching.

[via Don Surber]

Save and Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Furl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Fark

3 Responses to “Immigration Debate Rooted in Fairness”

1

All I ask is make it much much much harder to sneak in illegally and make it much much easier to come in legally.

As for the illegals already here, ignore them. Let them stay illegal, whatever. If they want to be legal they can leave and come back or they can continue to be illegal and be marginalized and exploited. That’s their choice.

2

Yes Matt. My lowering the costs of coming here legally it will reduce illegal immigration. I’m sure most potential illegals planning on immigrating would prefer entering legally.

3

Many believe that if they entered another country illegally they’d be arrested and deported in short order.

And yet I think that most people believe that if they were to enter another country illegally, and then live there for years paying taxes, working hard, and building a life for themselves and for others, and never breaking any other laws - I think most people’s sense of fairness would indicate that they should be allowed to stay, not have their family torn apart, their job ruined, their possessions taken away, etc.

I’m sensitive to the fact that these people broke our law to get here; but a lot of those laws are nonsensical and unjust (and racist in some cases). And what they’ve done with their lives since coming here, I think, counts for quite a bit.

Laws aren’t an end unto themselves. Laws are what we institute to have a fair and just society. Does to-the-letter enforcement of those laws promote that end? I don’t think it does.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>