The American Mind

It was never established that any forgery occurred, which you seem to forget; the fact that you can reproduce the memo with Microsoft Word is irrelevant; Word is a program designed to replicate the output of office machines.

Additionally, the closest friends and associates of the putative author of the memo (now deceased) confirmed that he had said exactly the kinds of things that are in the one unverifiable memo.

They shouldn’t have run with unverifiable documents, to be sure; but the idea that Rather was caught in some kind of forgery scam continues to be Republican myth.

“It was never established that any forgery occurred, which you seem to forget; the fact that you can reproduce the memo with Microsoft Word is irrelevant; Word is a program designed to replicate the output of office machines.”

That. is. so. insane. Waaay beyond “fake, but accurate.” You are trapped in your own myth.

“Never established…. blah blah blah…”

Grow up and get a brain. Good night, Chet.

That. is. so. insane. Waaay beyond “fake, but accurate.”

So prove it. Who was the forger? How were the forgeries inserted into Texas Air National Guard archives? How did they get Killian’s wife and friends to all agree that, yes, Killian had said exactly the same thing as the memo said, on several occasions?

You are trapped in your own myth.

If there’s evidence that the Killian memos were forgeries - what is it? Why can’t you present any evidence?

Why is it that you think this is settled, when your side had absolutely no evidence for its assertions whatsoever? Isn’t it just the least bit possible that everybody you know told you that these were forgeries - but that they were wrong, lying, or simply believed what they were told? And you believed them?

I’ve actually looked into the issue. Did you? It’s easy to call me names, but neither of you seem to have any evidence. Why is that?