Beauchamp: The Saga Continues

by Sean Hackbarth

We have documentation of a conversation that took place between editors of The New Republic and Scott Beauchamp. In those transcripts we know the soldier writer no longer wanted to defend himself. He wanted to put the whole issue of fake Iraq stories behind him and concentrate on his soldiering.

Now, we have word from TNR editor-in-chief Franklin Foer claiming that a few weeks after that interview Beauchamp called him and stood behind his dispatches.

Ok, maybe that’s true and maybe it isn’t. But this doesn’t address the factual weaknesses. Nor does it explain why TNR only bothered to tell us about these discussion after they were posted on the Drudge Report.

Foer and the gang must really love shovels; they can’t stop digging.

“TNR: Beauchamp Called Us Without the Army Goons Around and Stood by Everything”

Save and Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Furl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Fark

3 Responses to “Beauchamp: The Saga Continues”

1

It’s not clear which stories are supposedly fake.

2

Chet, that is so lame. You sound like Franklin Foer. Responsible journalism would have TNR doing some fact checking and vetting the stories as true. You and Foer have got it backwards.

3

Responsible journalism would have TNR doing some fact checking and vetting the stories as true.

Which stories? What makes you think that they didn’t?

Michelle Malkin said so? The Army investigated themselves and found themselves innocent of any misconduct?

I’m just asking a fucking question, jackass. Which stories, specifically, are not factual? Nobody who writes on this issue ever explains what Beauchamp is supposedly lying about. Isn’t that somewhat important?

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>