WSJ on Obama’s Winfall Tax

by Sean Hackbarth

In an editorial over the weekend The Wall Street Journal points out some problems I also mentioned with Sen. Barack Obama’s proposed windfall tax on oil companies and agree with him on the gas tax holiday. They also get to the crux of the issue of high gas prices:

Mr. Obama is right to oppose the gas-tax gimmick, but his idea is even worse. Neither proposal [Clinton’s or McCain’s] addresses the problem of energy supply, especially the lack of domestic oil and gas thanks to decades of Congressional restrictions on U.S. production. Mr. Obama supports most of those “no drilling” rules, but that hasn’t stopped him from denouncing high gas prices on the campaign trail. He is running TV ads in North Carolina that show him walking through a gas station and declaring that he’ll slap a tax on the $40 billion in “excess profits” of Exxon Mobil.

Windfall Profits for Dummies”

Save and Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Furl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Fark

2 Responses to “WSJ on Obama’s Winfall Tax”

1

Slapping a tax on oil company profits will convince them to lower their prices; yeah right!

2

Oil companies do not pay taxes, their shareholders pay them, and in turn they receive smaller dividends and reduced reinvestment of profits in their asset - the oil company.

I do not appreciate Obama taking taxes out of my 401(k) to punish me for my prudent investments. If the school teachers and other union members that he was speaking to understood how corporations in the United States actually operate, they would not be cheering Obama for stealing from their retirement accounts.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>