What If It Were Jindal Instead of Palin?
Would Gov. Bobby Jindal be enduring the same inexperience attacks if he were Sen. John McCain’s VP pick? If so then much of the McCain campaign’s screams of “sexism” fall flat. I’m surprised the Left hasn’t used this argument to counterattack.
The Left would attack both candidates’ religion since Jindal is an orthodox Catholic, but I doubt they’d be talking about the Louisiana governor being VP and raising his kids.













Jindal has less elected experience than Palin.
Jindal has far more demonstrable curiosity about national and world issues than Palin. He’s written law review articles and had papers published. There’s some indication that he’s given some thought to the challenges that face this country. If Palin has though about such issues she’s never shared them by authoring a paper or making a public statement. Jindal has far more formal education than Palin (he went to Brown and was a Rhodes scholar at oxford, Palin barely scraped together enough credits to get a journalsim BA from Idaho state). Jindal is 8 years younger than Palin
He also has far more experience on federal issues.
There are 3 issues that I think hurt Jindal. He barely meets the constitutional age limit for the presidency, he’s really young. The exorcism thing. They really wanted a woman after Obama didn’t pick Clinton.
Obama and Jindal are quite similar in background (although Obama is 10 years further down the road so there’s more of each). Both have a bit of governmental experience, outstanding educational backgrounds and a long record of thought leadership on issues. Palin is essentially a blank slate with a good personality and trained to read a teleprompter (that’s what you do in TV news).