|
|
5.5.2001 1:46 AM Pete Du Pont plainly describes the anti-trade protesters who pranced around Quebec City as socialists.
Those protesters don't believe in freedom and opportunity. They desire a false utopia where everyone is equal (in what way, I'm not sure), yet they fail to acknowledge that capitalism and free trade are what keeps them well fed, highly networked with their anti-trade friends, and allows them the time to protest. "Quebec's Commanding Heights" Sean Hackbarth | 1:27 AM Lance is still alive!! Long live Lance! Sean Hackbarth | 1:25 AM Is Minnesota Nice dead? Drunken Twins fans threw stuff at ex-Twin Chuck Knoblauch. The story does go on to offer some explanations of increase fan rowdyness at games. "Cheap-Seat Rowdyism is Sign of Troubling Trend" Sean Hackbarth | 5.4.2001 1:28 PM Stephen Moore makes the unfortunate prediction that the federal budget may grow 7% this years--twice the rate under Bill Clinton. Moore also observes, "If Republicans allow the budget to grow at twice the rate it did under Clinton, many conservatives are going to start asking the legitimate question: what are Republicans good for?" That's why I consider myself a conservative first and a Republican second. "The Grand Old Spending Party" Sean Hackbarth | 1:21 PM Colby, Colby, Colby! You lasted until the end because you could win immunity at will, but your final strategy stunk. Why choose to boot Keith over Tina when you even knew you had a better shot to win the million bucks with Keith? Let's back up further. Why did you help get Jerri kicked off? It would have been smooth sailing to the cash when compared to Satan's love child. You were also a little too happy when the votes were tallied and you LOST. You were the happiest loser I've seen in a long time. "Tina Takes 'Survivor 2'" Sean Hackbarth | 5.2.2001 9:00 PM Ed Trudeau is a jerk. Instead of finding another way of being competitive in the Burlington, WI gasoline business, he decided to cry to the government and complain that chain stations were charging too little. Yesterday, Trudeau was selling gas for $1.85 a gallon, but a competing station was selling gas for $1.69 a gallon. Cry Baby Ed is upset because $1.69 a gallon is below Wisconsin's minimum markup law. So, because of Cry Baby Ed's publicity stunt, people in Burlington are paying more for gas than what a station was willing to sell for. As with most predatory pricing laws, the minimum markup law doesn't help consumers, it helps businesses who don't have the ability to compete. Cranky Ed should get out of the gas business. I recomend the balloon business; he's full of hot air. "No Fueling: Rivals Spar Over Gas" Sean Hackbarth | 8:39 PM I fell for the myth that Thomas Jefferson sexually exploited one of his slaves, Sally Hemings. Now, a group of scholars say the evidence is flimsy. This report won't receive anywhere near the same attention as the January 2000 one. That's because that one was used by Bill Clinton's sympathizers to defend an immoral man. If the mighty Thomas Jefferson could take advantage of a slave and still be considered a great man, how can we judge the "moral failings" of William Jefferson Clinton? The perfect response is that Jefferson never was accused of lying to a grand jury and giving the bird to the rule of law. An even better response is to deny Jefferson exploited Ms. Hemings in the first place. This new report does that. "The Fable of Tom and Sally" [via Zeropolitics] Sean Hackbarth | 5.1.2001 6:22 PM Like Ronald Reagan, President Bush is rejecting the morally bankrupt argument that the only defense against nuclear war is mutually assured destruction. It's perfect that the first letters of that euphanism spell "MAD" becuase such a policy is mad. A proper role of government is to protect its citizens from foreign invasion. Whether it's from a navy assault (i.e. Pearl Harbor) or a nuclear missile attack, the U.S. government has an obligation to develop the means for an adequate defense. Bush has the moral high ground by calling for a missile defense system. Critics say that missile defense would violate the ABM treaty. However, Bush countered today by saying, "This treaty does not recognize the present or point us to the future. It enshrines the past. No treaty that prevents us from addressing today's threats, that prohibits us from pursuing promising technology to defend ourselves, our friends and our allies is in our interests or in the interests of world peace." The ABM treaty was signed in a day when Communist containment (rather than smart, moral confrontation a la Reagan) was the foundation of U.S. foreign policy. Now, the Cold War is over and only one member of that outdated treaty exists. Critics also say that building a missile defense would create a new nuclear arms race. Nations would build more and more nukes to overwhelm any shield the U.S. would build. That may be a result, but that doesn't address the moral argument that the U.S. government should provide its citizens an adequate defense. Defense technology does not remain stagnant or it becomes obsolete. The U.S. army improves the fighting capabilites of its jets and tanks. Other nations respond by developing new weapons to penetrate improved tank armor and jets' steal capabilities. Only anti-miltary pacifists would object to improving military technology for fear of starting an arms race. With that thinking, why even bother moving past wooden clubs and stones? Also, what's so bad about an arms race? The U.S. and the former Soviet Union ran one, and the good guys one. One nation is in the dustbin of history, while the other leads the free nations of the world. Anyone who thinks the U.S. couldn't win another arms race with China (or any other country) lacks any appreciation of U.S. economic dominance. Mark this down as an important event in the George W. Bush Presidency. "Bush Calls for Replacing ABM Treaty" "See Ya!" President Bush's remarks to the National Defense University Sean Hackbarth | 3:33 PM Anti-capitalistic feelings can't simply be swept under the rug. Today's protests world-wide demonstrate that many people think global capitalism is a threat. It isn't a threat, but with huge, complicated trade agreements like NAFTA and the WTO, many will find loopholes and exceptions that benefit some while harming others. Advocates of free markets and limited government must engage and counter the radical Leftist and anarchist collectivists who would love to see more "democratic" control over the means of production. It's no coincidence that these protests took place on May Day, an important Communist holiday. Pro-capitalist advocates (like myself) must make the case that capitalism is what allows millions of people to live more comfortable and productive lives. Capitalism is also the best chance for those gripped in dire poverty to rise out of their morass. "May Day Protesters Clash with Police" [via Drudge] Sean Hackbarth | 4.29.2001 11:18 PM William Kucewicz provides much needed sane analysis of California's energy crisis:
Kucewicz also mentions that federal regulators haven't found the price gouging Gov. Davis and others claim is causing sky-rocketing electricity prices. Investigators found:
The bureaucratic blocking of new generating plants is also mentioned as a cause of the electricity crisis.
For a solution to California's problem, Kucewicz goes back to Economics 101. There's more demand for electricity than producers are willing (or financially able) to supply. Since there's a ceiling on retail prices, prices can't go up. As a result, California has a power shortage. California needs more electricity, so Kucewicz recommends "jettison[ing] all controls on power prices." With prices allowed to rise, new suppliers would want to offer Californians electricity. The added supply will eventually force prices down. Along with removing price controls, new in-state power production must be freed from government hassles. Kucewicz likes the idea of "cookie cutter-style" plants that would meet environmental standards. These could then be quickly build without time-consuming bureaucratic interference. "California's Dreaming: California Electric Power Crisis; California Electricity Policy, Power Blackouts" Cato Institute's collection of electricity articles Sean Hackbarth | 12:26 AM Michelle Malkin gives President Bush a tongue-lashing over his environmental policy. No, she isn't upset about the arsenic and global warming stuff. She's thinks GW's giving in to the environmental Left. (I like to call them watermelons--green on the outside, red on the inside.)
"Bush's Environmental Guacamole" Sean Hackbarth | 12:14 AM The philosophical giant, Immanuel Kant wasn't the boring ivory tower thinker we thought he was. In a new biography of the man, Manfred Kuehn points out that Kant was a billiards man who rarely dined alone. Kant was definitely more than simply the man who Konigsberg set their clocks to. "Königsberg Confidential" Sean Hackbarth | |
ABOUT When I'm not pondering the fate of the universe, I'm reading, writing, or selling books. Here you'll find comments on politics, culture, books, and music. Not necessarily in that order. MAILBOX sean--at--theamericanmind.com ![]() Support democracy and human rights in Iraq! My Bloginality is INTP!!! WEBRINGS « LibertyLoggers » < ? wiscoblogs # > WEBLOGS WIRES AP International AP National AP Politics AP Sports UPI COLUMNISTS Buckley Goldberg Kudlow Novak Horowitz Noonan Reynolds Sowell Will NEWSPAPERS Ha'aretz LA Times Milwaukee Journal Sentinel NY Times Washington Post Washington Times MAGAZINES The American Prowler The Atlantic City Journal Commentary Enter Stage Right First Things FrontPage IntellectualConservative.com In the National Interest National Review New York Times Magazine Opinion Journal Reason Spintech The Weekly Standard NEWS 1stHeadlines ABCNews BBC CNN Cybercast News Service Drudge FoxNews MEMRI MSNBC BOOKS All Consuming The New Republic New York Times Town Hall Book Club Washington Post Weblog BookWatch TECH News.com Wired News HUMOR Mallard Fillmore The Onion ARCHIVE Comments by: YACCS template by HELQUIN
|