Bald Eagle Picture

5.5.2001

1:46 AM
Pete Du Pont plainly describes the anti-trade protesters who pranced around Quebec City as socialists.

They are one part 19th-century Luddites arguing that trade and global commerce (for the Luddites it was machines and the industrial revolution) will cause exploitation, unemployment and poverty. And they are one part 20th-century Marxists, justifying violence (they threw Molotov cocktails at the police) and control over markets, governments and privately owned business in the name of a greater good: a society in which everyone is equal. The Quebec City protesters prefer a lower standard of living equally shared to growing prosperity unequally distributed.


Those protesters don't believe in freedom and opportunity. They desire a false utopia where everyone is equal (in what way, I'm not sure), yet they fail to acknowledge that capitalism and free trade are what keeps them well fed, highly networked with their anti-trade friends, and allows them the time to protest.

"Quebec's Commanding Heights"

Sean Hackbarth |



1:27 AM
Lance is still alive!! Long live Lance!

Sean Hackbarth |



1:25 AM
Is Minnesota Nice dead? Drunken Twins fans threw stuff at ex-Twin Chuck Knoblauch. The story does go on to offer some explanations of increase fan rowdyness at games.

"Cheap-Seat Rowdyism is Sign of Troubling Trend"

Sean Hackbarth |

5.4.2001

1:28 PM
Stephen Moore makes the unfortunate prediction that the federal budget may grow 7% this years--twice the rate under Bill Clinton. Moore also observes, "If Republicans allow the budget to grow at twice the rate it did under Clinton, many conservatives are going to start asking the legitimate question: what are Republicans good for?" That's why I consider myself a conservative first and a Republican second.

"The Grand Old Spending Party"

Sean Hackbarth |



1:21 PM
Colby, Colby, Colby! You lasted until the end because you could win immunity at will, but your final strategy stunk. Why choose to boot Keith over Tina when you even knew you had a better shot to win the million bucks with Keith? Let's back up further. Why did you help get Jerri kicked off? It would have been smooth sailing to the cash when compared to Satan's love child. You were also a little too happy when the votes were tallied and you LOST. You were the happiest loser I've seen in a long time.

"Tina Takes 'Survivor 2'"

Sean Hackbarth |

5.2.2001

9:00 PM
Ed Trudeau is a jerk. Instead of finding another way of being competitive in the Burlington, WI gasoline business, he decided to cry to the government and complain that chain stations were charging too little. Yesterday, Trudeau was selling gas for $1.85 a gallon, but a competing station was selling gas for $1.69 a gallon. Cry Baby Ed is upset because $1.69 a gallon is below Wisconsin's minimum markup law. So, because of Cry Baby Ed's publicity stunt, people in Burlington are paying more for gas than what a station was willing to sell for. As with most predatory pricing laws, the minimum markup law doesn't help consumers, it helps businesses who don't have the ability to compete.

Cranky Ed should get out of the gas business. I recomend the balloon business; he's full of hot air.

"No Fueling: Rivals Spar Over Gas"

Sean Hackbarth |



8:39 PM
I fell for the myth that Thomas Jefferson sexually exploited one of his slaves, Sally Hemings. Now, a group of scholars say the evidence is flimsy. This report won't receive anywhere near the same attention as the January 2000 one. That's because that one was used by Bill Clinton's sympathizers to defend an immoral man. If the mighty Thomas Jefferson could take advantage of a slave and still be considered a great man, how can we judge the "moral failings" of William Jefferson Clinton? The perfect response is that Jefferson never was accused of lying to a grand jury and giving the bird to the rule of law. An even better response is to deny Jefferson exploited Ms. Hemings in the first place. This new report does that.

"The Fable of Tom and Sally" [via Zeropolitics]

Sean Hackbarth |

5.1.2001

6:22 PM
Like Ronald Reagan, President Bush is rejecting the morally bankrupt argument that the only defense against nuclear war is mutually assured destruction. It's perfect that the first letters of that euphanism spell "MAD" becuase such a policy is mad.

A proper role of government is to protect its citizens from foreign invasion. Whether it's from a navy assault (i.e. Pearl Harbor) or a nuclear missile attack, the U.S. government has an obligation to develop the means for an adequate defense. Bush has the moral high ground by calling for a missile defense system.

Critics say that missile defense would violate the ABM treaty. However, Bush countered today by saying, "This treaty does not recognize the present or point us to the future. It enshrines the past. No treaty that prevents us from addressing today's threats, that prohibits us from pursuing promising technology to defend ourselves, our friends and our allies is in our interests or in the interests of world peace." The ABM treaty was signed in a day when Communist containment (rather than smart, moral confrontation a la Reagan) was the foundation of U.S. foreign policy. Now, the Cold War is over and only one member of that outdated treaty exists.

Critics also say that building a missile defense would create a new nuclear arms race. Nations would build more and more nukes to overwhelm any shield the U.S. would build. That may be a result, but that doesn't address the moral argument that the U.S. government should provide its citizens an adequate defense. Defense technology does not remain stagnant or it becomes obsolete. The U.S. army improves the fighting capabilites of its jets and tanks. Other nations respond by developing new weapons to penetrate improved tank armor and jets' steal capabilities. Only anti-miltary pacifists would object to improving military technology for fear of starting an arms race. With that thinking, why even bother moving past wooden clubs and stones?

Also, what's so bad about an arms race? The U.S. and the former Soviet Union ran one, and the good guys one. One nation is in the dustbin of history, while the other leads the free nations of the world. Anyone who thinks the U.S. couldn't win another arms race with China (or any other country) lacks any appreciation of U.S. economic dominance.

Mark this down as an important event in the George W. Bush Presidency.

"Bush Calls for Replacing ABM Treaty"

"See Ya!"

President Bush's remarks to the National Defense University

Sean Hackbarth |



3:33 PM
Anti-capitalistic feelings can't simply be swept under the rug. Today's protests world-wide demonstrate that many people think global capitalism is a threat. It isn't a threat, but with huge, complicated trade agreements like NAFTA and the WTO, many will find loopholes and exceptions that benefit some while harming others.

Advocates of free markets and limited government must engage and counter the radical Leftist and anarchist collectivists who would love to see more "democratic" control over the means of production. It's no coincidence that these protests took place on May Day, an important Communist holiday. Pro-capitalist advocates (like myself) must make the case that capitalism is what allows millions of people to live more comfortable and productive lives. Capitalism is also the best chance for those gripped in dire poverty to rise out of their morass.

"May Day Protesters Clash with Police" [via Drudge]

Sean Hackbarth |

4.29.2001

11:18 PM
William Kucewicz provides much needed sane analysis of California's energy crisis:

The important point is, given the above constraints, the 1996 utility restructuring law can hardly be called "deregulation." Strict regulations continued to abound. Worse, the rules affected two of the power market's most essential functions -- pricing and contracting. California thus got the worst of both worlds: higher-than-necessary power prices and lower-than-needed electricity supplies. It's no wonder Californians are irate.


Kucewicz also mentions that federal regulators haven't found the price gouging Gov. Davis and others claim is causing sky-rocketing electricity prices. Investigators found:

In November and December of 2000, the market was driven by extreme cold, high natural has prices and low storage levels, and by low water, precipitation and stream flow levels. These conditions were made worse by an operating environment with a large number of outages and environmental constraints, and the general atmosphere of market uncertainty surrounding the extreme nature of these fundament factors. In this environment, power prices rose to extremely high levels for much of the period, levels above short-term power production costs and, if sustained, above long-term costs as well.


The bureaucratic blocking of new generating plants is also mentioned as a cause of the electricity crisis.

This isn't to say that power producers didn't want to construct new generating facilities in the Golden State. The industry asked to build 25 power plants in recent years, capable of producing 15,500 megawatts. This would have increased in-state power generation by more than one-third. It also would have represented more electricity than California currently imports. However, the agency responsible for siting and licensing approvals, the California Energy Commission, had, until recently, okayed only five of the units. In other words, California's rolling blackouts wouldn't have occurred had the commission acted in a more timely manner.


For a solution to California's problem, Kucewicz goes back to Economics 101. There's more demand for electricity than producers are willing (or financially able) to supply. Since there's a ceiling on retail prices, prices can't go up. As a result, California has a power shortage. California needs more electricity, so Kucewicz recommends "jettison[ing] all controls on power prices." With prices allowed to rise, new suppliers would want to offer Californians electricity. The added supply will eventually force prices down.

Along with removing price controls, new in-state power production must be freed from government hassles. Kucewicz likes the idea of "cookie cutter-style" plants that would meet environmental standards. These could then be quickly build without time-consuming bureaucratic interference.

"California's Dreaming: California Electric Power Crisis; California Electricity Policy, Power Blackouts"

Cato Institute's collection of electricity articles

Sean Hackbarth |



12:26 AM
Michelle Malkin gives President Bush a tongue-lashing over his environmental policy. No, she isn't upset about the arsenic and global warming stuff. She's thinks GW's giving in to the environmental Left. (I like to call them watermelons--green on the outside, red on the inside.)

Bush was supposed to restore rationality to America's approach to environmental risk in the modern world. Instead, he has sought vainly to score points with soccer moms, Sierra Club dads and MTV deadheads. The result is a pale green policy mish-mash of environmental guacamole that's thoroughly indigestible.


"Bush's Environmental Guacamole"

Sean Hackbarth |



12:14 AM
The philosophical giant, Immanuel Kant wasn't the boring ivory tower thinker we thought he was. In a new biography of the man, Manfred Kuehn points out that Kant was a billiards man who rarely dined alone. Kant was definitely more than simply the man who Konigsberg set their clocks to.

"Königsberg Confidential"

Sean Hackbarth |

ABOUT
When I'm not pondering the fate of the universe, I'm reading, writing, or selling books. Here you'll find comments on politics, culture, books, and music. Not necessarily in that order.

MAILBOX
sean--at--theamericanmind.com

Iraqi Democracy graphic
Support democracy and human rights in Iraq!


blog.meetup.com

My Bloginality is INTP!!!

WEBRINGS
« LibertyLoggers »
< ? wiscoblogs # >

WEBLOGS


WIRES
AP International
AP National
AP Politics
AP Sports
UPI

COLUMNISTS
Buckley
Goldberg
Kudlow
Novak
Horowitz
Noonan
Reynolds
Sowell
Will

NEWSPAPERS
Ha'aretz
LA Times
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
NY Times
Washington Post
Washington Times


MAGAZINES
The American Prowler
The Atlantic
City Journal
Commentary
Enter Stage Right
First Things
FrontPage
IntellectualConservative.com
In the National Interest
National Review
New York Times Magazine
Opinion Journal
Reason
Spintech
The Weekly Standard

NEWS
1stHeadlines
ABCNews
BBC
CNN
Cybercast News Service
Drudge
FoxNews
MEMRI
MSNBC


BOOKS
All Consuming
The New Republic
New York Times
Town Hall Book Club
Washington Post
Weblog BookWatch


TECH
News.com
Wired News


HUMOR
Mallard Fillmore
The Onion


ARCHIVE


Powered by Blogger Pro™
Dreambook Using blogBuddy
Comments by: YACCS
template by HELQUIN

www.blogwise.com