Bald Eagle Picture

8.17.2002

10:49 PM
A Cuban rap festival where performers are bashing the Communist government may seem like a threat to Fidel Castro, but reading farther into the story, you come across this quote from a member of Obsesion:

We want to improve the revolutionary process, to change what is wrong.

This isn't pop culture being used to topple the status quo. An American who performed at the festival reinforced that. "The black youth are trying to create space for their own identity. They are critical, but they are not bashing the revolution."

How did the Cuban government prevent rap from becoming a weapon?

The ruling Communist Party at first censored rap music but then sought to assimilate the rapidly growing social phenomenon by allowing rap on radio and television, and organizing an annual festival.


"Cuban Rap Festival Starts with Social Protest"

Sean Hackbarth |



3:37 AM
Baseball players say they'll strike August 30 if a deal can't be reached with baseball owners. The snag in negotiations is the payroll tax. Players want it at $130 million, while owners want it at $102 million. The players are right when they say it will prevent salaries from rising as much as they would without the tax. The owners don't have the guts to ask for a real salary cap. Salary caps are in place in football and basketball and those players are continuing to see pay increases without constant labor conflicts.

A strike would be devastating. Football is in its pre-season, and that's already driving interest away from baseball. Many cynical baseball fans will shrug their shoulders and give up on the sport they grew up with.

"Baseball Is Two Weeks from a Strike"

Sean Hackbarth |

8.16.2002

2:15 AM
Here's a great bit from Mark Steyn:

Meanwhile, the left has an hilarious bumper sticker: "Celebrate Diversity." In the newsrooms of America, they celebrate diversity of race, diversity of gender, diversity of orientation, diversity of everything except the only diversity that matters: diversity of thought.

The same can be said of most universities.

"How About a Little Diversity of Thought?"

Sean Hackbarth |



1:56 AM
Donald Rumsfeld on the re-opening of the Pentagon's E-Ring:

I think it's -- that it certainly says that the folks who have been working day and night to finish this building have just done a superb job. And it is a real compliment to them that they are able to begin the process of moving in this E Ring, and they expect to be able to complete it, as I understand it, by September 11th. And we are all grateful to them for what they've done and for the dedication and the patriotism that they've shown.

I think the fact that this building never shut down and the fact that it is going to be well along on September 11th, back in the shape it was in before September 11th last year, is an indication that the Department of Defense is in business, and it intends to stay in business.

...

[W]e intend to live our lives as free people and to go about our business and to do everything we can to defend our people, our country, our allies and our deployed forces against terrorist acts. And we know that terrorists can attack at any time, at any place, using any technique, and it's not possible to defend every time at every place against every technique. So it is a difficult task that we're faced with, but we are determined to go about our lives like free people and not allow a terrorist to win simply by threatening and intimidating.

DoD News Briefing - Secretary Rumsfeld and Gen. Franks

[UPDATE: Robert DeNiro was at Rumsfeld's briefing. Why, I don't know.]


Sean Hackbarth |

8.15.2002

11:30 PM
America's most ferocious weapon has entered the Islamist War. Families of the September 11 attacks are releasing the legal hounds. They're suing banks, charities, and three members of the Saudi royal family. Hell hath no fury than a lawyer seeking a big payday. This is one instance where I hope the trial lawyers sock the defendants for everything they're worth.

"9-11 Families Sue Alleged Terror Financiers"

Sean Hackbarth |

8.14.2002

10:55 PM
With the coming one-year anniversary of the September 11th attacks, America seems to be "back to normal" as President Bush wanted us to be. While there's plenty of talk in the air of if and when to attack Iraq, most public discussion revolves around the stock market and corporate corruption. Democrats are focusing completely on the economy as their path to Congressional victory in the fall. Bar patrons wonder if pro baseball players will strike and if they really care. It may be collective denial or naive hubris, but it doesn't feel like we're at war.

Rod Dreher worries about America's mental state:

There are not enough Americans like him, I fear. In the past year, the anger and resolve that gripped the nation in the immediate aftermath of September 11 seems to have dissipated. Not everywhere, mind you: on my recent trip down South, I saw American flags everywhere, and lots of men wearing NYPD and FDNY caps, and fading T-shirts trumpeting slogans like, "Never forget!" But nobody can doubt that America is not where it needs to be, emotionally and psychologically, as we get ready for a war that could result in thousands of American casualties, and perhaps even biological, chemical and even nuclear attacks on our cities.


Dreher wants the networks to start showing the awful video of the planes crashing to the WTC. He also wants video of victims jumping from the towers to escape the fire and smoke. A visual jolt to the system is what Dreher is calling for.

How's this for a visual jolt. At The Bunker in the Town of Rochester, WI a special ceremony is planned.

Make no mistake: The party will be just as heartfelt as others across the country. But Bunker owners Jeff Hartzheim, Steve Oschmann and Mike Fischer didn't want people to end Sept. 11 with heavy hearts.

Hence, they developed an elaborate memorial celebration that will begin with a traditional military-style memorial ceremony and culminate with a "payback" where a figure of Osama Bin Laden will go up in flames.

I think Dreher would approve.

"America, Be Angry"

"Burning Bin Laden"

Sean Hackbarth |



10:34 PM
Mount Pleasant, WI's Plan Commission ordered an owner of a Dairy Queen to repaint the resturant and pay a $50,000 fine. The crime committed was it was painted red, white, and blue without town permission. On Monday, the town board voted to nix the Plan Commission's punishment and put the issue behind everyone. "I introduced this motion because I want this issue to go away," said Supervisor Mark Gleason. Why it's the town's business when a business can paint their building and in what colors, I don't know. I'm sure it has something to do with "quality of life" or some other kind of schpeel that tramples on property rights. Maybe the dark sky people should jump on this. In a way, a building's color scheme could be considered light pollution.

"Town Attorney to Rule on Dairy Queen Colors"

Sean Hackbarth |



9:24 PM
James Bowman sees the strangeness in the clash over UNC's required reading of Approaching the Qur'an: The Early Revelations:

Yet things are not so bad as either side likes to make out--and both sides would have good points to make if there were a genuine debate. Mr. Sells's supporters, the ACLU and the characteristically spineless university administrators at Chapel Hill are perfectly correct in saying that it is completely unfair of conservatives to imply that they are apologists for terrorism just because they believe in studying Islam. But the conservatives are also right to say that the version of Islam given in Mr. Sells's book is bowdlerized, and many of the more bloodthirsty texts from the Koran, particularly those to do with the slaying of infidels--by which is intended most of those who will read these words--are silently omitted.

In the end, UNC isn't making students read the book to better understand Islam. It's all about political correctness and an inflated sense of piety. Bowman writes, "the UNC teach-in is all for the sake of making the teachers feel better, and more virtuous, for showing off their own tolerance in public."

At least there's one UNC Christian making sense on the Islam dispute. Fred Eckel doesn't have a problem with the required reading.

It seems to me that studying religions is an important thing on a college campus. It helps us begin to recognize that we need to understand other people. I hope it will lead Christian students in making an effort to better understand their own religion.


"Teaching Islam"

"A Kinder, Gentler Koran"

Sean Hackbarth |



6:07 PM
Alicia Colon went into a den of pro-abortion GOP women and came away unnerved.

But I wasn't about to get into an in-depth discussion with women who are obviously not interested in candor and I came away from that reception with two impressions. The first is that moderate Republican women are really just wealthy liberal Democrats who do not want their taxes raised. The second is that they have no concept of the core principles guiding the party of Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Reagan.

"No Such Thing as Moderate GOP Women"

Sean Hackbarth |



4:22 AM
A Washington, D.C. EMT believed that she would be fired if it was discovered she was pregnant. So what does she do? She gets an abortion. What kind of mindset does it require to choose a job over a baby? The rationale is simple: the baby really isn't a baby; it's just a clump of cells. Even if it was a baby, a job is much more important. Does the sanctity of human life even exist for the unborn any more? Through dehumanization and convience millions of children are legally killed. Does human progress exist? Abortion and its blood brother, the Culture of Death, sometimes makes me wonder.

"Action Sought in Abortion Advice" [via Instapundit]

Sean Hackbarth |



3:44 AM
John makes a simple yet reasonable case for attacking Iraq and finishing the Gulf War. [Page down to the paragraph that starts "Why Is Iraq Our Top Priority."] However, he gets a little carried away about the repercussions of Iraq's liberation and a democratic revolution in Iran:

At that point, I expect Syria and Lebanon to just roll over rather than take us on militarily, Saudi Arabia is so reliant on our oil dollars that they'll almost have to comply once we have full access to Iraqi oil, and the Israelis can handle the Palestinians. Then our military's work will largely be done in the Middle East and we'll only have North Korea to deal with.

This seems way too simplistic. Syria and Lebanon will roll over? I've heard no one make a case to remove the dictators of Syria and free its puppet Lebanon. And even if Washington officials have thought about it, would the American public support attacking Syria? Critics of another Iraq war have said that there's no direct link between Iraq and the September 11th. attacks. Therefore, there's no justification to invade. They're wrong, but imagine what more reasonable arguments they could make for not invading Syria. There's no link between Syria and September 11th., and no one thinks they're building nukes. Why would Syria roll over if it didn't think the U.S. would attack?

And what does John mean when he writes that Saudi Arabia will "have to comply once we have full access to Iraqi oil?" After Iraq has been liberated, will the House of Saud see the err of their ways and allow their citizens some semblance of freedom? It's not that simple. The Saudi royal family has no history of supporting human rights and has no intention of giving up power just because there's a democracy to their north.

John seems to think that an Iraqi war will solve many of the problems in the Middle East and end the Islamist terrorism threat. No, the Islamist threat has been brewing for years and years. It's the response to an Islamic world that has been economically, politically, and culturally defeated by the West (see Bernard Lewis' What Went Wrong). The rage of the Arab street will not be placated by a liberated Iraq or the fall of the House of Saud. Cultural change within the Islamic world is needed. That means Muslims must find a way to treat women fairly, to understand the need to reasonably separate religion and government, and to respect and appreciate the power of human freedom. This will take time, decades, probably longer. Looking at it this way, war with Iraq becomes only a baby step.

Sean Hackbarth |



2:52 AM
Since much of the economic slowdown is because of a dramatic drop in capital spending (consumer has propped up the economy, although that's starting to falter), IBM laying off 15,000 workers because of "the recent decline in corporate spending on technology services" isn't encouraging for recovery.

"IBM Cutting More Than 15,000 Jobs"

Sean Hackbarth |



2:41 AM
My Blogcritics review is up, but you've already read it, haven't you?

Sean Hackbarth |

8.13.2002

1:39 PM
An e-mail posted at The Corner describes the Milwaukee Brewers' lame attempt at entertainment:

The weirdest "Rally animal" belongs to the Milwaukee Brewers, who always flash the Rally Rabbit on the replay screen. The Rally Rabbit is a grown man dressed in shorts, old tennis shoes, a Brewers jersey and an Easter Rabbit head. Just before the bottom of the 8th or 9th of a close game at Miller Park, they show this strange creature (who I'm sure would scare small children) prancing around the parking lot and then playing some drum set in front of Miller Park. They even brought out the Rally Rabbit before the bottom of the 9th of the All-Star Game. It's not very effective, judging by the Brewers' record.

As a distraught Brewers fan, the rabbit makes me cringe. I'm pretty sure if they found this guy in costume banging away on his pail on a street corner in downtown Milwaukee, he would be arrested and given plenty of psychological treatment.

Sean Hackbarth |



1:21 PM
President Bush takes a stand against excessive federal spending by not releasing $5.1 billion in an anti-terrorism bill. Vetoing the huge farm bill would have been more fiscally responsible, but it's more symbolic than Bush's economic forum. What we need to see is Bush calling for pushing up last year's tax cuts. That might inspire more business investment while helping immediately with cash flow.

"Bush Assures Summit Participants Economy Under Control"

Sean Hackbarth |



2:55 AM
John at Right Wing News has a pretty good rant on blacks and the GOP:

I'll grant you that the Republican party isn't the right choice for every black American. If you believe in group identity politics, view everything through a racial prism, are ultra-sensitive to perceived racial slights, are for Affirmative Action, racial set-asides for minority businesses, & reparations then you are probably better off voting Democrat.

On the other hand, if you're Conservative, own a business, want school vouchers, are sick of having the government take so much of your paycheck in taxes, and want criminals in jail instead of walking the street, then you should be voting Republican.



Sean Hackbarth |



2:36 AM
Blogcritics is up and running. Today, there will be a chat with RIAA president Cary Sherman on the future of the music industry. My review of Willy Porter's latest disk isn't up yet. I know Eric is really busy with the wife and kids, but I'm getting antsy.

Sean Hackbarth |



1:52 AM
Australia is having an important debate over embryonic stem cells (ESC). Pro-lifers claim that scientists could go beyond harvesting stem cells to using embryoes for drug and cosmetic testing. The logic is sound if macabre. If it's alright to kill an embryo to get its stem cells, why not test the safety of cosmetics or the efficacy of drugs? The embryo is only a bunch of cells. How can moral qualms stand in the way of science and medicine?

"Pro-Lifers Say Embryonic Stem Cell Researchers Not Motivated By Possible Cures"

Sean Hackbarth |



1:38 AM
The worst burden from Alzheimer's disease is that on family members who watch their loved one slip away from them. CNSNews.com reports that Ronald Reagan no longer recognizes his wife Nancy. Say a prayer for both of them.

Sean Hackbarth |



1:32 AM
The sudden popularity of DVDs over VHS tapes shows that "lock-in" may not be the anti-trust weapon some economists, lawyers, and policy wonks think it is. This has implications on the Microsoft anti-trust case. Paxton Hehmeyer writes:

As Microsoft and others await Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly?s imposition of a remedy for the company?s violation of antitrust laws, Microsoft is already developing new operating systems and features intended to replace Windows in the same way that Windows replaced DOS. This technology could very well render pointless all the litigation against Microsoft?s dominant position in the PC operating systems market by changing the very definition of the market itself.

Consumer choices made DVDs one of the fastest growing electronics products ever, toppling VHS?s 20-year dominance of the recorded media market. Similarly, it should be consumer choices, not court-imposed restrictions or mandates, which select the new standard in OS technology ? one that will likely break Windows.

"Rise of DVDs Casts Doubt on Microsoft Ruling"

Sean Hackbarth |

8.12.2002

12:54 AM
Here's a treat. Alan Wellikoff, author of The Civil War Supply Catalogue, gives TAM a historian's view of Disney edutainment. It isn't pretty, folks. Thanks Alan, for allowing me to publish this. You may have earned the title TAM History Consultant.

Goofy-American History
by Alan Wellikoff

"Today we came under attack by the combined forces of the Imperial (crackle, crackle, oooweeeooo, crackle)"
- F.D.R.'s radio announcement of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in Epcot Center's "American Adventure."

Walt Disney believed that history was best taught as entertainment, which is partly why Pocahontas enjoys more fame than the 1909 Payne-Aldrich Tariff. Of course, Mr. Disney advanced this theory way back in the 1950s, just as the country itself was beginning to take on characteristics of a fun park, with its wild frontier getting carved into a site map of Mickey Mouse suburbs and burger-themed miracle miles. However, as it's been just a few years since the Disney Corporation proposed to build an American Historyland not far from the site of the Battle of Bull Run, it might do well to consider just how that subject fares at the company's existing wonder worlds. One place to go is Disney World's Epcot Center in Orlando, Florida.

On my last visit, Disney's "American Adventure" stood like a neocolonial insurance company headquarters in the midst of nearly a dozen other national pavilions. In its lobby, tourists ignored revolutionary-era artifacts until permitted to enter a theater with seats that (unlike those at most other Epcot attractions) didn't move along tracks. The house was an admirably patriotic iteration of a Loew's movie palace, its stationary chairs redeemed by the "magical mix of motion pictures and Audio-Animatronics imagineering" that unfolded before their occupants.

Signaling the start of the American Adventure, house lights dimmed and music swelled as -- trembling slightly on their lifts -- robots rose. These weren't sinister cyborgs, but effigies of Mark Twain and Ben Franklin that -- appropriate to the mixture of past and present they represented -- were to be our cohosts for the performance. Although artificial as a couple of diet Yoo-Hoos, robots Franklin and Twain were astonishingly lifelike and performed their tasks with no less skill that might be found, say, in a junior high production of Our Town.

After introductions, Franklin and Twain yielded to a succession of fellow replicants from beneath the stage and a US history unfolded: Jefferson bantered amicably as he prepared a draft of the Declaration; silhouetted atop his horse Nelson, Washington contemplated nation-building at Valley Forge. Then, and in a gesture reminiscent of Jiminy Cricket snuffing out a candle in Pinocchio, George Washington Carver doused a lantern for the night on a Mississippi river raft. What's this, you say? G. W. Carver floating down the Mississip' on an old river raft? Well, I suppose it could've happened, perhaps on some well-earned break from peanut experimentation. But in iconographic terms, Carver riding a Mississippi raft is a bit like Huckleberry Finn working in a Tuskegee research lab. Sure, Carver's a genuine historic figure, but in American-Adventure terms, the ante-bellum river-rafting franchise belongs to the two greatest figures in American literature -- Huck and his runaway slave companion, Jim. Needless to say, these two have always been controversial figures, and only recently the scourge of a language police too horrified by 19th-century "N-word" usage to understand either the historical or the subversive political context in which they appeared. You'd think that Twain's cyborg might've lifted a servomotor in the defense of his characters. I've got a green-backed Franklin that says the old man himself would have done as much.

This little episode was a harbinger of the schizophrenic political correctness that informs the American Adventure. Partly, it's one that reinforces the postwar California progress-ideal for which the original Disneyland stands as a monument. On the other hand, it's a variation on Disney's customary telling of American history that's a bit like Cubby and Annette being replaced in the Mouskateer lineup with Charles and Mary Beard.

In the first instance, Andrew Carnegie, and other, less philanthropical robber barons emerge from beneath the American Adventure's orchestra pit to remind us that the progress ideal still so evident at all Epcot attractions had its beginnings in 19th-century Social Darwinism. Here, the indelibility of the Tomorrowland trust in technological progress trounces standard-issue political correctness. Thus, Disney's pro-tech article of faith is enough to save the memory of even Gilded-Age capitalists from the plundering cast of their popular image.

However, although he's cordial toward fellow android Twain, Ben Franklin's favorite author appears to be John Steinbeck, to whom he referred twice. Was this the Wonderful World of Historical Revisionism with Disney returning Franklin to us as a Pinkerton-fighting Wobbly in a cocked hat? Was a coy parallel being drawn between the embattled farmers who first fired the "shot heard 'round the world" and the migrant farm workers of Steinbeck's In Dubious Battle? Maybe so, but the American Adventure cannot be dismissed as simply an endorsement of Depression-era polemics -- for Disney doesn't just leave the stage to reconstituted colonial grape-boycotters like Franklin.

As part of history that diligently pays tribute to those political movements that have come into vogue since you, Fess Parker and I were young -- and as a likely sop to Epcot's many German and Japanese visitors -- the American Adventure covers both World Wars without any mention of just whom it was we fought, much less why we did so. Also, in a Magical Kingdom take on the revisionism for which American history texts have become so notorious, such denizens of the historical fringe as Chief Joseph, Susan B. Anthony, and even John Muir got full robot-and-set status, while even Honest Abe enjoys no more screen time than Say-Hey Willie. Why? Maybe it's because Lincoln's one dead white male whose animatron is doing nicely over at Disneyland, or -- as JFK also gets short shrift in this program -- perhaps it's because the American Adventure considers martyrdom more in the province of the Moroccan pavilion just down the street at Epcot.

In all, these weird couplings, additions and omissions attain a greater strangeness when limned in the cartoon style of early Disney histo-dramas - only this time the politics have changed. A clockwork Sally Ride flying the Discovery space shuttle through the heavens like Herbie the Lovebug wouldn't have been out of place here. Nor would a funicular Mike Fink polling down the Big Muddy in concert with Emiliano Zapata, Haym Salomon, Rosa Parks and Squanto. Their finale might proclaim Disney's dictum that in order to entertain, history must also be inoffensively p.c. -- for in its own way, Disney history is anything-can-happen day.

Email Alan at cwcatalog@aol.com

Copyright 2002, Alan Wellikoff


Sean Hackbarth |

8.11.2002

10:57 PM
According to federal officials, scientists doing stem cell research can experiment on stem cell lines derived after 8.9.2001--the day Bush gave his stem cell speech--as long as private money is funding it. Some like OxBlog's Josh Chafetz don't mind it, but for me this shows the need for a ban on this kind of research. Proponents can claim all they want about the possible benefits, and they might be right, but the method towards those benefits is barbaric and inhuman.

Notice this paragraph in the NY Times story:

Dr. Melton, who receives a mix of private and federal financing, said he had derived new stem cell lines in his laboratory. "Some of these presidential lines aren't as robust as we'd like," he said, referring to the lines covered by Mr. Bush's announcement. "That's why we have gone through the trouble to derive our own lines. But it's still early days."

Melton "derived new stem cell lines in his laboratory." Unless I'm mistaken, the only way I know to get new stem cells is by fertilizing eggs with sperm, waiting a few days for the zygote to develop, then extract them from the embryo resulting in its death. I know stem cells have been harvested from umbilical cord blood, so I suspect that's not where Melton got his stem cells from. You "harvest" those cells not "derive" them. He created human life just to snuff it out for his scientific goals. Sounds awfully Mengelian to me.

"U.S. Rule on Stem Cell Studies Lets Researchers Use New Lines"

Sean Hackbarth |



10:22 PM
A crass way of driving traffic to TAM is to link to a few shots of the lovely Ann Coulter, the Twiggy of the conservative world. Here's Ann living it up, adult beverage in hand. Here's Ann picking off Lefty webloggers who pissed her off (note the high heels with the shorts). Here are the four faces of Ann. Then there's Ann on Court TV.

To make this post semi-newsworthy, she's on C-SPAN's Booknotes tonight. [link via Brothers Judd]

Sean Hackbarth |



2:51 PM
The amount of Republican loveliness is beyond words. During the 2004 political conventions watch carefully when the cameras panned the crowd. I'll guarantee you see sexier women at the GOP's convention than at the Democrats'.

Republican BABE of the Week!

Sean Hackbarth |



2:24 PM
Bomb Iraq on September 11th? It would certainly make for a memorable anniversary. Europe would go bonkers. Writers for the Guardian and Independent would go balistic over the blood-lusting Americans taking out their anger against oppressed Iraqi civilians (whether any were hurt or not). Warbloggers would cheer. Just don't do it for symbolism. Do it to advance the goal of destroying Saddam. If it's only to boost American morale, then it would look awfully Clintonian. Bush et al. must focus on the goal: liberating Iraq. If a September 11th. strike fits into that, fine, drop a laser guided bomb for me.

"Rush Limbaugh: Blast Iraq on 9-11" [via Right Wing News]

Sean Hackbarth |



12:55 PM
Dan Santow has some words of advice for memoir writers:

As a memoir, however, every page of "Bronx Boy" rings false. Shouldn't something called a memoir by its author be a memoir, as opposed to a piece of fiction?

He arrived at this because at the end of Jerome Charyn's "memoir" Bronx Boy there's a disclamer that reads:

Although this memoir was inspired by the experiences of my childhood, certain characters, places, and incidents portrayed in the book are the product of imaginative re-creation and these re-creations are not intended to portray actual characters, places, or events.

So, it's not really a memoir at all. The closest thing it comes to is fiction deeply based on personal experiences. Sounds kind of like Saul Bellow's Ravelstein, but at least his fictional tribute to Allan Bloom was labled as ficiton.

"When `A Memoir' Doesn't Really Denote a Memoir"

Sean Hackbarth |



2:37 AM
David Friedman has laid out the basis for reducing spam by selling access to your e-mail box. What is required is an easy-to-use program that takes care of the digital stamps and e-cash stuff (Hello, eBay/PayPal). One reason e-mail encyption isn't widely used is because it isn't easy to use. PGP may be the easiest, but all that public and private key business makes my head swirl, and I'm a rabid computer user. This idea is great on paper, but until it's developed into something practical, we're stuck with old fashion filtering.

"Mail Me the Money!"

Sean Hackbarth |



2:23 AM
It only took one column and I despise the Independent even more than the Guardian. What set me off? Adrian Hamilton's insipid piece the calls for the invasion of the U.S. Why? According to Hamilton

Not only is it building an arsenal the like of which the world has never seen, it has unilaterally withdrawn from the treaties designed to limit the spread of nuclear weapons, and has refused to accept any kind of international monitoring of its chemical or nuclear weapons facilities.

It has a government in power without the legitimacy of a democratic majority, in the hands of a coterie from a single part of the country and clearly aiming at a dynasty of rule. Its rhetoric is one of violent aggression against anyone seen as its enemies. It opponents are locked up without trial or the right to habeas corpus.

In other words, in order to protect the West from the Islamist and Communist threat (both China and North Korea), an American military build-up is immoral. Hamilton also claims Bush shouldn't be President because he didn't get a majority of the popular vote. I doubt Hamilton is aware that the U.S. has been under this sort of arrangement since the passage of its constitution. Ironically, an American leader at the time with the same surname would have spurned the suggestion of a purely popular vote for the Presidency.

But does Hamilton stop? No, he offers another reason for invasion.

Of course it has a peculiarly obnoxious regime, ready to poison its own people with corrupt capitalism and deregulated pollution.

Note the word "regime" instead of government, implying its illegitimacy. To Hamilton, the corporate scandals of Enron and WorldCom were born by the Bush administration. In fact, much of the illegal activity happened before Bush took office. Hamilton doesn't lambaste the Clinton gang for "poison[ing] its own people with corrupt capitalism." As for pollution, Hamilton thinks any disagreement with the environmental Left is cause to accuse Bush of poisoning people.

The column is tongue-in-cheek, but the attitude toward America is real and biting. Hamilton can't accept the fact that the U.S. is the world superpower. He is opposed to anything that appears to have a great deal of power--he calls Microsoft, Exxon, and General Electric the Zaibatsu. As a knee-jerk Leftist, his instict is to attack big boys and refuse to see the good they offer to the world. For Hamilton, the U.S. can do no right, but deep down, I think he realizes that the world would be worse off with a lesser U.S. That's what really bugs him.

"Yes, We Need a 'Regime Change' in this Rogue State..."

Sean Hackbarth |



1:46 AM
Patrick points out the same strategy I mentioned (here and here) Bill Simon must take to beat Gray Davis. Only Patrick used a few more words. He goes on:

A challenger's sole reason for being in our political system is to attack. And Bill Simon should attack. Simon should give a quick, candid mea-culpa, and then he should put this behind him and lunge to the attack--on Oracle, on energy, on taxes. That's what challengers ultimately must do, even if they're losing (and the polls don't seem to show that Bill Simon is). A challenger's has only a brief and limited time to convince voters and not a moment of it can be wasted in a defensive posture. If Simon defines a vulnerable Gray Davis well and relentlessly enough, political reality will eventually catch up with him.

Every once in a while TAM can get ahead of the budding political strategist.

Sean Hackbarth |



1:32 AM
I know I posted a story on Jon Messner's hijacking of an al-Qaeda (al-Qaida?) website (pun intended), but Blogger's messed up my archives and Google isn't helping either. Anyway, Wired News has a report on how Messner did it. I'm still bummed that it took the FBI five days for someone with Net skills to talk to Messner. The feds have to hire lots of geeks and quickly.

"How Al-Qaida Site Was Hijacked"

Sean Hackbarth |



12:53 AM
Prof. Reynolds pointed me to the song "The Secret World of Charles Kuralt" by The Tumblin' Sneakers Band. Funny yet sad.

Sean Hackbarth |

ABOUT
When I'm not pondering the fate of the universe, I'm reading, writing, or selling books. Here you'll find comments on politics, culture, books, and music. Not necessarily in that order.

MAILBOX
sean--at--theamericanmind.com

Iraqi Democracy graphic
Support democracy and human rights in Iraq!


blog.meetup.com

My Bloginality is INTP!!!

WEBRINGS
« LibertyLoggers »
< ? wiscoblogs # >

WEBLOGS


WIRES
AP International
AP National
AP Politics
AP Sports
UPI

COLUMNISTS
Buckley
Goldberg
Kudlow
Novak
Horowitz
Noonan
Reynolds
Sowell
Will

NEWSPAPERS
Ha'aretz
LA Times
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
NY Times
Washington Post
Washington Times


MAGAZINES
The American Prowler
The Atlantic
City Journal
Commentary
Enter Stage Right
First Things
FrontPage
IntellectualConservative.com
In the National Interest
National Review
New York Times Magazine
Opinion Journal
Reason
Spintech
The Weekly Standard

NEWS
1stHeadlines
ABCNews
BBC
CNN
Cybercast News Service
Drudge
FoxNews
MEMRI
MSNBC


BOOKS
All Consuming
The New Republic
New York Times
Town Hall Book Club
Washington Post
Weblog BookWatch


TECH
News.com
Wired News


HUMOR
Mallard Fillmore
The Onion


ARCHIVE


Powered by Blogger Pro™
Dreambook Using blogBuddy
Comments by: YACCS
template by HELQUIN

www.blogwise.com